Noninvasive neuromagnetic single-trial analysis of human neocortical population spikes

https://sfb-retune.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Waterstraat-et-al.-2021-Proc-Natl-Acad-Sci-U-S-A-Preview-1-scaled-e1647511756939.jpg
Authors
Gunnar Waterstraat, Rainer Körber, Jan-Hendrik Storm, Gabriel Curio
Journal
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.

Neuronal spiking is commonly recorded by invasive sharp microelectrodes, whereas standard noninvasive macroapproaches (e.g., electroencephalography [EEG] and magnetoencephalography [MEG]) predominantly represent mass postsynaptic potentials. A notable exception are low-amplitude high-frequency (∼600 Hz) somatosensory EEG/MEG responses that can represent population spikes when averaged over hundreds of trials to raise the signal-to-noise ratio. Here, a recent leap in MEG technology-featuring a factor 10 reduction in white noise level compared with standard systems-is leveraged to establish an effective single-trial portrayal of evoked cortical population spike bursts in healthy human subjects. This time-resolved approach proved instrumental in revealing a significant trial-to-trial variability of burst amplitudes as well as time-correlated (∼10 s) fluctuations of burst response latencies. Thus, ultralow-noise MEG enables noninvasive single-trial analyses of human cortical population spikes concurrent with low-frequency mass postsynaptic activity and thereby could comprehensively characterize cortical processing, potentially also in diseases not amenable to invasive microelectrode recordings.

Published: 2021 Mar

Figure 4

Relation between hfSERs and low-frequency evoked responses; exemplary data of subject S1. Trials were sorted according to the rms amplitude of single-trial hfSERs. This procedure clearly differentiated between weak (5th percentile) and strong (95th percentile) hfSERs while the noise level remained approximately constant. Notably, concurrently evoked low-frequency components of single-trial responses were approximately equal for weak and strong hfSERs (Top). This was corroborated by forming percentile-specific subaverages (Bottom) of low-frequency responses, which were equal despite a clear gradual recruitment of hfSER subaverages underlining the effectiveness of the single-trial sorting.

https://sfb-retune.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/logo-charite.png
https://sfb-retune.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/logo-ukw.png
https://sfb-retune.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/logo-uni-duesseldorf.png
https://sfb-retune.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/logo-ltr.png
https://sfb-retune.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/logo-mpi.png
https://sfb-retune.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/logo-uni-potsdam.png
https://sfb-retune.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/logo-uni-rostock.png
https://sfb-retune.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/logo-uni-wuerzburg.png
https://sfb-retune.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/logo-bernstein.png